Until recently, I didn’t delve much into the EIGRP protocol. Despite Cisco opening it up to IETF in 2013, I have yet to run into EIGRP on another vendor’s platform, so in my opinion it was still relegated to Cisco only networks.

However, I decided to take the plunge into Cisco’s certification track as a side project and completed the first step this week – the CCNA! Along the way I had to pick up some rudimentary information around the EIGRP protocol and how it compares to OSPF. Contrary to some marketing experts, there are some key differences between EIGRP and OSPF that are useful to keep in the back of your head when designing networks.

First, the similarities:

  • They are both internal L3 routing protocols
  • They both converge quickly
  • They both scale very well
  • They both have summarization, filtering, and metric tuning capabilities.

Next, the differences of note for EIGRP:

  • EIGRP keeps the successor route in the routing table, which is the best possible route to the destination. It also holds feasible routes in the topology table, which are alternate routes to the destination that can be utilized if the main route crashes and burns. This provides pretty fast failure recovery. OSPF developed a similar feature to this called Fast Reroute.
  • EIGRP supports unequal cost multipathing. OSPF requires equal costs paths before it will load balance, something that can be achieved with some manual tweaks.
  • EIGRP’s routing metric can be tweaked. By default it will only consider bandwidth and delay, but there are five possible metrics – Bandwidth, Load, Delay, Reliability, and MTU (kind of, only used as a tiebreaker). By contrast, OSPF looks at link speed alone.
  • EIGRP offers more flexible summarization – each EIGRP router can offer summarization, while OSPF is limited to summarization at the ABR or ASBR. This is due to differences between link state and distance vector mechanics.
  • On the same token, EIGRP offers more flexible route filtering – each EIGRP router supports filtering, while OSPF must filter at the ABR, ASBR, or directly on each router individually. Filtering type 1 or type 2 LSAs within the same area can cause routing loops.

This is a basic level summary, but my takeaway is that EIGRP seems to support more “nerd knobs” than OSPF.

Final verdict? While the network geek within me likes the fancy details, I’m not sure that those nerd knobs make a big enough difference for me personally to recommend EIGRP over OSPF in a new network. The business owner doesn’t care much about the geeky details – they just want to know that traffic will reach what it’s supposed to reach in a timely fashion, and both EIGRP and OSPF support that admirably. I see more and more multivendor systems being deployed… for example, Palo Alto has a very well built feature set, but they only support OSPF. HP has some very solid access layer switches, but they only support OSPF. If you chose EIGRP, you have a painful path ahead of you in the future if you want to take advantage of those products. By choosing an open routing protocol, you ensure that you can choose the best product fit for your company in the future.

The “Wireless Workplace”

Mobile devices are really changing everything – how we communicate, where we work, how readily we can find information, and more. The majority of people in the US own between 3 and 4 mobile electronic devices, and most of these devices don’t even have the option to use a network cable. It’s just easier not to have to plug in somewhere. What if you could free your employees to use a wireless connection as their main form of connectivity even while they are at work, while still preserving your needed network performance and security?

This is a very real possibility today. The concept is enticing on several fronts. First and most importantly, it gives your employees a lot of flexibility. Most employees are already using mobile devices, including laptops, tablets, smartphones and more. So why have them tethered to a specific desk? With a robust wireless workplace design in place, your employees can work anywhere and meet with anyone literally anywhere. Finally, if the office needs to be re-arranged, you don’t have to pay contractors to run new cables and rewire each desk!

Benefits of Working Wirelessly

This can lead to significant cost savings. For example, American Fidelity Assurance moved to mobile-first network design and saved over $700,000. California State University found that only half of their wired ports were being used across their 23 campuses and moved toward a design that emphasized wireless connectivity and saved $30 million on their network refresh.

Downsides of Working Wirelessly

People tend to like their privacy. While the wireless geek in me likes the idea of fine tuning an RF fabric to the point where wires are no longer a necessity, don’t go overboard on the “open office floor plan.” Remember that sound carries, background noise can really lower the perceived professionalism on a conference call, and everyone likes to have a place they can call their own.Just because you move to an all wireless network doesn’t mean that it’s a great idea to buy a bunch of beanbags and call it a day.

Technology Advances

An all wireless office  is possible through recent wireless advances like 802.11AC, which brings gigabit speeds to wireless clients, and 802.11AC Wave Two, which introduced MU-MIMO and made single stream transmissions more efficient. However, it’s not enough to simply put up several new access points and call it a day. Wireless technology is resilient at the core, but proper design is still critical.

Considerations for a Wireless Workplace

If you’re interested in moving to a wireless environment, there are several things to consider.

  1. You should understand that wireless is a shared medium. Think of it like a grouping of two-way radios. If someone is holding down the transmit button, no one else can speak until the channel is free again. Only one person can transmit at a time and everyone has to wait their turn! That’s exactly how an enterprise wireless system works behind the scenes. The more clients you have connected to a single access point, the less broadcast time they each will get. For that reason, it’s better to design for capacity rather than raw coverage and it’s important to have a good idea of where people will congregate.
  1. Wireless networks operate in two unlicensed spectrums – 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz (ISM and U-NII, respectively). The great thing about unlicensed spectrums is that you don’t need to pay any license fees to use them, but that means that anyone and everyone can do the same. Remember the first point that wireless is a shared medium? Well, chances are good is that there’s already RF noise in your office, especially in the 2.4GHz spectrum. It’s often generated by wireless security cameras, Bluetooth systems, microwaves, and neighboring wireless systems. I don’t say this to discourage you – issues like this can be designed around by making intelligent channel selections – but it’s important to have someone come in to your location and take measurements on the existing wireless noise so your channel plan can be built for your unique environment.
  1. While the access point selection is important, the wireless clients implemented are just as important. If your access points support 802.11ac, and your wireless clients support 802.11ac in both the 2.4GHz and 5.0GHz spectrums, you have a good shot at getting great transmission speeds. But if you have older wireless devices that can only support, say, 54 Mbps with the 802.11g standard, they will not transmit at gigabit speeds regardless of the capabilities of the access point. Instead, the access point itself will downshift to their slower standard so they can communicate. This will work without issue as backwards compatibility should be present at the AP, but it will slow down your overall performance. Be sure that you know what clients you will need to support in your environment and adjust as needed!
  1. Considering security is a must. Wireless security has come a long way since the days of the WEP standards, so chances are almost non-existent that a malicious outsider will be able to break directly in through your wireless network. However, if an authorized employee brings an infected laptop to the office and puts it on your corporate network you could still be in trouble. It’s important to define a company policy for BYOD (bring your own device) and set strict security parameters, not just around the employee but around the device they are using on your network as well. This is fully possible with a network access control platform like Aruba’s ClearPass or Cisco’s ISE.

To summarize, the all-wireless office is a very real possibility and a well-made RF fabric can be a great asset to any company, but proper design is critical. Thankfully, there are many tools available to ensure that your transition to a wireless workplace environment is painless and smooth. I hope that this article has given you a few things to consider as a starting point.

SD-WAN Solutions

Tin Can String

Below is a rough “marketing blog” that I wrote for Edge. Forgive some of the marketing speak, but I wanted to share this here as SD-WAN is a big hot topic with a lot of exciting potential. If you want to swap ideas and compare notes… hit me up!


Is your wide area network a source of stress? Office boundaries are blurring as campuses evolve and expand, more and more services are being stored in a centralized location, and just about everything is moving to the network, making wide area network connectivity a proud member of the “mission critical” realm. Without a well-designed WAN you are sure to have some headaches!

There are two predominant WAN solutions out there today – MPLS packaged with related services like VPLS, and a network of point-to-point VPN tunnels over the internet. Each has their own advantages and drawbacks. For example, MPLS can offer a higher level of guaranteed service and can host a variety of services like Metro Ethernet but it can be expensive. VPN tunnels over internet are more affordable but because they go over the internet they can be more susceptible to jitter and disruption, and managing a full mesh of VPN tunnels can be a hassle without the right hardware and an ADVPN based or similar solution. The standard “Hybrid WAN” approach balances these options by bundling the two services together and routing traffic across the links via policies, often using MPLS for critical traffic and a larger broadband link for less sensitive applications.

This standard static routing definition does leave something to be desired. First, you are still paying a substantial amount for the high performance circuit. On average, a private WAN subscription will cost 10x more per Mbps than a broadband link. Second, you are often paying for bandwidth that you aren’t using … even though a broadband pipe can be sized up to multigig speeds, it is often underutilized because it has a bad reputation for being less stable. However, broadband internet is improving and in some cases is able to offer latency that would be acceptable for mission critical applications. What if you could closely monitor the performance of that broadband link and intelligently use the excess bandwidth for your prioritized traffic, but only when the health of the pipe meets your application’s criteria? A software defined WAN could give you that capability.

The world of SD-WAN has emerged to solve classic WAN problems like the ones listed above. Manufacturers have different definitions for SD-WAN technology, but the underlying intent is the same – to simplify your wide area network administration and utilize your bandwidth more intelligently. This can be done through a variety of methods. Some manufacturers provide hardware that coordinate tunnel creation through a management platform and gather real time link health information so traffic is sent down the best path. Some companies do this via a software platform that can be installed in a public cloud like AWS, allowing for easy migration to a hybrid cloud model. Some remove all responsibility from your premises and provide peering locations on the web that take over the WAN for you and get the traffic where it needs to be. Several manufacturers are capable of monitoring each individual packet as it traverses the WAN and collecting real time telemetry, allowing for packet by packet forwarding decisions, millisecond failover between links, and session continuity even in link failure. Even better, with the level of insight and QoS that the telemetry can provide you can start moving away from expensive MPLS subscriptions entirely and instead start bundling multiple broadband links together to provide a resilient WAN. The desired result is a seamless and high performance WAN that can support the new generation of collaboration tools.

There is no “one size fits all” SD-WAN solution, as every network has its own unique set of requirements and challenges and every manufacturer has their own take on this new technology. But that’s why Edge is here to help. If you are interested in learning more about how you can use SD-WAN to lower your bandwidth bills and enhance your user experience give us a call!


Introduction and other Necessities


I am not sure how you found this page, but I am impressed.  Unless I am a big public figure at the time that you read this, in which case, I guess it’s understandable. But that would raise other concerns.

In case you couldn’t tell I am not a professional writer, blogosphere architect, or social media guru. What I am is a computer networking junkie that likes to learn and then attempt to share some version of that knowledge with others.

Currently I am employed as a Solutions Architect with Edge Solutions, LLC, with a strong focus on the latest and greatest trends in the networking industry. On my path to this position I learned a LOT from other gearheads in social media and now I want to give back what I can.

Why should you listen to me? Well, first of all, no one said you should. But in addition to having a number of arcane acronyms to my name indicating that I can pass a test, I have been involved in the tech industry for several years now, I am detail oriented, and I am conscientious to a fault. I will do my best to not lead you astray.

Thanks for reading and looking forward to learning together!